SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5389

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
RASALF C K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 452 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.12/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ADITHYA RAJEEV
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C. ASHI, SR. PP

Bail granted due to lack of sufficient evidence and no criminal antecedents of the applicant.

Headnote:This application seeks bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicant, accused No.1 in Crime No.12/2026, is alleged to have committed serious offences by stabbing the first informant. The Court found that since the investigation is nearly complete and the applicant has no prior criminal record, bail is warranted. The Court instructed the applicant to comply with conditions set for bail.

Result: The application is allowed.

Table of Content
1. court analysis leads to granting bail under specified conditions. (Para 1 , 4)
2. allegations involve serious criminal acts. (Para 2)
3. arguments for and against bail presented. (Para 5)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.12/2026 of Koyilandy Police Station, Kozhikode District. The offences alleged are punishable under Section s 126 (2), 118(1) and 110 read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNS ’).

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that at 12.30 a.m. on 02.01.2026, accused Nos.1 to 4, in furtherance of their common intention, wrongfully restrained the first informant at Koyilandy harbour, and the applicant stabbed the first informant on the back with a broken piece of glass. When the applicant attempted to stab him again, the first informant evaded the attempt; had he not so evaded, it would have caused his death. Thus, the accused are alleged to have committed the aforementioned offences.

4. I have heard Sri.Adithya Rajeev, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 13.01.2026. The investigation is almost over and recovery has been effected. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top