SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5465

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ANEESH T S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 14556 OF 2025|CRIME NO.1271/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.MOHAMMED RAFEEQ, SRI.BIBIN MATHEW, SRI.P.M.MATHEW, SRI.AMARNATH R LAL, SMT.VISHNUMAYA ANANDAN, SHRI.SANALDEV E.P., SHRI.SONYMON ANTONY, SHRI.ABHIJITH P.A.
For the Respondents: SRI.K.A. NOUSHAD, SR. PP

Pre-arrest bail is granted when allegations are not substantiated by material evidence, ensuring cooperation with ongoing investigations.

Headnote:This judgment concerns an application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for pre-arrest bail concerning alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court finds the applicants innocent with no materials connecting them to the crime, thus granting bail. The main issues included the sufficiency of evidence and the risk of tampering with investigations, which the court addressed by stating that custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail conditions imposed include regular reporting to the investigating officer and non-contact with witnesses. The application is therefore allowed.

Table of Content
1. allegations of assault and investigation details. (Para 2)
2. court's analysis on evidence and decision. (Para 4 , 6)
3. arguments regarding innocence and evidence. (Para 5)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. The applicants are the accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.1271/2025 of Mulanthuruthy Police Station, Ernakulam District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 296(b), 110 read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNS ).

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on

16.11.2025 at about 10.30 p.m., while the defacto complainant and his friend were present in a bar hotel, the accused persons assaulted them using an unknown weapon, causing head injury to the friend of the defacto complainant.

4. I have heard Sri.K.Mohammed Rafeeq, the learned counsel for the applicants and Sri.K.A.Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the above crime. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicants with the alleged crime; hence, they are entitled to get bail. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicants, and if they are released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6. The incident occurred in a bar. Admittedly, there was clash between the defacto complainant and the applicants. There is no indication in the First Information Statement that any weapon has been used, so as to attract Section 118 (1). The applicants do not have any criminal antecedents. Considering the allegations made against the applicants, their custodial interrogation seems unnecessary. For these reasons, I find this to be an appropriate case to grant pre-arrest bail to the applicants.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The applicants shall be released on bail in the event of their arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/-

(Rupees One lakh only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The applicants shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting themselves to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicants shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. They shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicants shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicants shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicants shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top