IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ANEESH T S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 14556 OF 2025|CRIME NO.1271/2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of assault and investigation details. (Para 2) |
| 2. court's analysis on evidence and decision. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. arguments regarding innocence and evidence. (Para 5) |
ORDER
This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-arrest bail.
2. The applicants are the accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.1271/2025 of Mulanthuruthy Police Station, Ernakulam District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 296(b), 110 read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNS ).
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on
16.11.2025 at about 10.30 p.m., while the defacto complainant and his friend were present in a bar hotel, the accused persons assaulted them using an unknown weapon, causing head injury to the friend of the defacto complainant.
4. I have heard Sri.K.Mohammed Rafeeq, the learned counsel for the applicants and Sri.K.A.Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the above crime. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicants with the alleged crime; hence, they are entitled to get bail. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicants, and if they are released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.
6. The incident occurred in a bar. Admittedly, there was clash between the defacto complainant and the applicants. There is no indication in the First Information Statement that any weapon has been used, so as to attract Section 118 (1). The applicants do not have any criminal antecedents. Considering the allegations made against the applicants, their custodial interrogation seems unnecessary. For these reasons, I find this to be an appropriate case to grant pre-arrest bail to the applicants.
In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-
(i) The applicants shall be released on bail in the event of their arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/-
(Rupees One lakh only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.
(ii) The applicants shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting themselves to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.
(iii) The applicants shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. They shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.
(iv) The applicants shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.
(v) The applicants shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.
(vi) The applicants shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.
(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.