SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5469

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
PREMA M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 100 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.RAJEEV, SRI.V.VINAY, SRI.M.S.ANEER, SHRI.SARATH K.P., SHRI.ANILKUMAR C.R., SHRI.AKASH CHERIAN THOMAS, SMT.DIPA V., SHRI.AZAD SUNIL, SHRI.T.P.ARAVIND, SMT.AKSHARA S., SHRI.MAHESWAR PADICKAL, SHRI.K.S.KIRAN KRISHNAN
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C. ASHI, SR. PP

Compassionate grounds may justify the granting of leave to convicts despite procedural non-compliance with prison regulations.

Headnote:The court analyzed Rule 400 of the Kerala Prisons and Correctional Services (Management) Rules, 2014, which requires a government civil surgeon's certificate for emergency leave. The petitioner sought emergency leave for her son, a convict, to accompany her for surgery, which was initially denied based on procedural grounds. The court found that while the certification was not strictly compliant, compassion warranted the granting of emergency leave. The court ultimately ordered the 4th respondent to grant emergency leave to the convict from 01.02.2026 to 03.02.2026.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for convict's leave denied due to non-compliance with prison rule. (Para 1)
2. court exercised discretion to grant leave based on compassionate grounds. (Para 2)
3. court ordered emergency leave for the convict. (Para 3)

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 31st day of January, 2026 The petitioner is the mother of the convict who is undergoing imprisonment at Central Prison & Correctional Home, Kannur. The surgery to the trigger finger of the petitioner is fixed on 02.02.2026. The petitioner sought for emergency leave for the convict to accompany her on the date of surgery and during hospitalization thereafter. It was rejected as per Exhibit P3 order on two grounds: (i) the certificate appended along with the application is not that of a civil surgeon of a Government Hospital as provided under Rule 400 of the Kerala Prisons and Correctional Services (Management) Rules , 2014 (‘the Rules’ for short). (ii) The illness of the petitioner is not fatal and critical in nature.

2. It is true, that the certificate produced by the petitioner is not that of a civil surgeon of the Government Hospital. However, it is issued by the Surgeon of the ESI Hospital, Kannur. The certificate would show that the petitioner has already been admitted for surgery and the surgery is scheduled on 02.02.2026. It is also true that there is nothing on record to show that the petitioner is critically ill, so as to attract Rule 400 of the Rules. However, considering the fact that the convict is the son of the petitioner, who is an aged lady, I am of the view that by exercising the jurisdiction vested with this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 3 day’s emergency leave can be granted to the convict.

3. Hence, the 4th respondent is directed to grant emergency leave to the son of the petitioner, who is the convict in S.C No.659 of 2011 from 01.02.2026 to

03.02.2026.

The writ petition(criminal) is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top