Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
BINDHU.K.P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's emergency leave application for the convict. (Para 1) |
| 2. counsel's arguments regarding the necessity of emergency leave. (Para 2) |
| 3. court grants five days of emergency leave. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is the wife of the convict No. 8106 who is undergoing imprisonment at Central Prison and Correctional Home, Viyyur, Thrissur. The petitioner has delivered a baby recently on 24.1.2026. The baby is admitted in the NICU with neonatal birth asphyxia as evident from Ext.P3 certificate. The petitioner, even before the delivery has applied for emergency leave for the convict to accompany her at the hospital. The said representation marked as Ext.P2, which was given as early as on 19.1.2026 was rejected. It is in these circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court.
2. I have heard Sri. Subash Chandran, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. K.A. Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.
3. The petitioner has applied for emergency leave for the convict before the delivery of the baby. Now she has delivered a baby and it is admitted in NICU with neonatal birth asphyxia. It is submitted that there is nobody to look after the petitioner
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
