SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5471

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SHEEJA C – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 159 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.RAJEEV, SRI.V.VINAY, SRI.M.S.ANEER, SHRI.SARATH K.P., SHRI.ANILKUMAR C.R., SHRI.K.S.KIRAN KRISHNAN, SMT.DIPA V., SHRI.AKASH CHERIAN THOMAS, SHRI.AZAD SUNIL
For the Respondents: SRI.K.A. NOUSHAD, SR. PP

Emergency leave can be granted to convicts for attending to family health emergencies under Article 226.

Headnote:The petitioner sought emergency leave for her sick husband under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenging the rejection of her request based on Rule 400(7)(ii) of the Kerala Prisons and Correctional Services (Management) Rules. The court found merit in the plea citing the petitioner's medical condition and granted leave for 3 days. The court emphasized the balancing of rights in light of emergencies, underscoring the unique circumstances of the case. Thus, emergency leave was directed for the convict from 01.02.2026 to 03.02.2026 verbatim from the court's order.

Table of Content
1. petition for emergency leave due to health. (Para 1)
2. the appeal's grounds presented. (Para 2)
3. court's reasoning for granting leave. (Para 3)
4. final order for emergency leave. (Para 4)

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 31st day of January, 2026 The petitioner is the wife of the convict No.CC

6317 who is undergoing imprisonment for life in the Central Prison & Correctional Services, Poojapura. The petitioner is seriously ill and a growth was detected on her left breast. Doctor has advised a surgery which is scheduled on 02.02.2026. The petitioner preferred Exhibit P2 representation before the 4th respondent to grant emergency leave to the convict to accompany her at the time of surgery and thereafter during hospitalization. It was dismissed as per Exhibit P3 order. Challenging the said order, the petitioner has approached this Court.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.

3. The request of the petitioner to grant emergency leave for her husband was rejected on the ground that there is a bar under Rule 400(7)(ii) of the Kerala Prisons and Correctional Services (Management) Rules, since the convict was convicted under Section 392 of IPC. It is true that there is such a bar. However, Exhibit P1 would show that the petitioner has a growth on her breast and surgery is scheduled on 02.02.2026. According to the petitioner, there is no person to take care of her at the hospital.

4. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of this case, I am of the view that the convict can be granted 3 days’ emergency leave invoking the power of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India . Hence, the 4th respondent is directed to grant emergency leave to the husband of the petitioner, who is the convict No.CC 6317 from

01.02.2026 to 03.02.2026.

The writ petition(criminal) is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top