SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5472

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
RADHAMANY K.P. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.V.T.RAGHUNATH, SMT.C.V.RAJALAKSHMI
For the Respondents: SRI.K.A. NOUSHAD, SR. PP

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 31st day of January, 2026 The petitioner is the mother of convict, who is undergoing life imprisonment at Central Prison & Correctional Home, Tavanur. The petitioner moved an application for ordinary leave/parole before the 4th respondent. Exhibit P1 is the representation. The 4th respondent gave Exhibit P2 reply to Exhibit P1 stating that Exhibit P1 representation has already been forwarded to the 3rd respondent.

2. Hence, the 3rd respondent is directed to take a decision on Exhibit P1 representation based on the recommendation of the 4th respondent regarding grant of parole to the son of the petitioner in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Accordingly, the writ petition (criminal) is disposed of.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top