Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MR. MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
DR. REKHA P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's challenge against kpsc's order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the application and reasons for kpsc's action. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. tribunal's rationale for dismissing the challenge. (Para 6) |
| 4. legal principles governing reservation and adjustment of turns. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. court's observations regarding its supervisory jurisdiction. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. final assessment and adherence to statutory provisions. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. conclusion of the court on the legality of the tribunal's order. (Para 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
The applicant in O.A. (EKM)No.411 of 2025 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Additional Bench at Ernakulam (the ‘Tribunal’ for short) filed this original petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , challenging the order dated 28.05.2025 passed by the Tribunal in that original application.
“a. Call for the records leading to Annexure A5 Appointment Chart; Set aside the same;
c. Declare that the 2nd respondent does not have the authority to convert a Turn reserved for the E/B/T community as per the Annexure to KS & SSR roster to a reservation for LC/AI communi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
