SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5481

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
YOOSAFALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 345 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.J.SANTHOSH, SHRI.ANTONY PAUL, SRI.RENJITH B.MARAR
For the Respondents: SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. BINDU.O.V

Compliance with trial rules necessary for proper scheduling of cases.

Headnote:The judgment pertains to a criminal miscellaneous case involving the sole accused challenging the trial court's scheduling of the case without complying with Rule 19(4) of Criminal Rules of Practice. The court found that the prosecution must comply with the rule within 15 days before rescheduling the trial. Relevant issues included the obligations under the rule and the readiness for trial. The court ordered compliance within a specific timeframe.

Table of Content
1. the scheduling of trial must adhere to specified procedural rules. (Para 1)
2. prosecution's compliance with requirements is essential for case advancement. (Para 2)
3. court mandates prosecutorial compliance and trial rescheduling. (Para 3 , 4)

O R D E R Dated this the 31st day of January, 2026 The sole accused in SC. No.739/2025 on the file of the Fast Track Special Court-II, Thrissur, arising out of Crime No.887/2024 of Anthikad Police Station filed this Criminal MC alleging that the trial court has scheduled the case for trial before complying the mandate of Rule 19(4) of Criminal Rules of Practice .

2. Upon instructions, the learned Public prosecutor fairly conceded that though the Prosecutor filed Annexure A2 before the trial court, it does not amount to sufficient compliance of Rule 19(4) of the Criminal Rules of Practice .

3. In the above circumstance, this Criminal M.C. is disposed of with a direction to the Prosecution to comply the mandate of Rule 19(4) of Criminal Rules of Practice within a period of 15 days from today.

4. There will be a further direction to the learned Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court-II, Thrissur, to see that the prosecution complies Rule 19(4) of Criminal Rules of Practice before scheduling the case. The learned Special Judge, is also directed to provide at least 15 days period to the petitioner before scheduling the case for trial after the prosecution complies Rule 19(4) of .

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the trial court has scheduled the case for trial from 2.2.2026 onwards. Therefore, the learned Public Prosecutor is directed to give necessary instructions to the learned Prosecutor appearing before the trial court, to see that the case scheduled on

2.2.2026 is rescheduled appropriately.

(Issue copy to both sides today itself)

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top