Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
AZEEZ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. requirement for compliance with procedural mandates. (Para 1) |
| 2. public prosecutor acknowledges merit in complaint. (Para 2) |
| 3. court order directing compliance within 15 days. (Para 3) |
| 4. court's directive to allow time before trial scheduling. (Para 4) |
O R D E R Dated this the 31st day of January, 2026 The sole accused in SC. No.330/2024 on the file of the Additional Sessions Court-III, Thrissur, arising out of Crime No.372/2017 of Kodungallur Police Station filed this Criminal MC alleging that the mandate of Rule 19(4) of Criminal Rules of Practice is not complied in this case and without complying the same the trial court has scheduled the case for trial.
2. The learned Public prosecutor, upon instructions, submitted that there is merit in the complaint raised by the petitioner.
3. Therefore, this Criminal M.C. is disposed of with a direction to the Prosecution to comply the mandate of Rule 19(4) of Criminal Rules of Practice within a period of 15 days from today.
4. There will be a further direction to the learned IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Thrissur, to see that the prosecution complies Rule 19(4) of Criminal Rules of Practice before scheduling the case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
