SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5483

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
MOHAMMED RASHID – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.M.FIROZ
For the Respondents: SMT.BINDU O.V.

ORDER

Dated this the 31st day of January, 2026 The petitioner who is the sole accused in L.P.No.52/2024 on the file of the Fast Track Special Court, Parappanangadi, arising out of Crime No.226/2024 of Vengara police station, filed this Crl.M.C. under Section 528 of BNSS , praying for a direction to the Special Court to consider the bail application, to be preferred by the petitioner on the date of surrender itself.

2. According to the learned counsel, the petitioner went abroad on 09.11.2023 and the FIR was registered only thereafter on 04.03.2024. Therefore, he could not appear before the Special Court in time which resulted in issuing coercive steps against him. He is ready to surrender before the learned Special Judge within a period of 15 days from today. His apprehension is that, in case he surrenders and moves the bail application, the learned Special Judge may not consider the same on the date of filing itself.

3. Upon considering the relief claimed and after hearing the learned Public Prosecutor as well as the learned counsel for the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this Crl.M.C., with a direction to the petitioner to surrender before the learned Special Jud

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top