STALIN BENNY vs STATE OF KERALA - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5485

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5485

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
STALIN BENNY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ARUN FRANCIS, SRI.JOBIN PAUL, SMT.DEENA JOSEPH, SHRI.HARIKRISHNAN K., SHRI.AKHIL SHAJI
For the Respondents: SRI.TOM JOSE OZHUKAYIL, SMT.GEETHA JOB(OZHUKAYIL), SHRI.ABREM K. JOY, SRI.TOM JOSE, SMT.TANYA TOM

ORDER

Dated this the 31^st day of January, 2026 The petitioners are absent. There is no representation. There was no representation for the petitioners on the last posting date also. Hence, this Crl.M.C is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5485

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC. PRATHEEP KUMAR, JSTALIN BENNY – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
STALIN BENNY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent