Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5486

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
KOCHUCHERUKKAN NARAYANAN – Appellant
Versus
PARVATHY SAROJAM – Respondent
RSA NO. 942 OF 2010

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.VIJI
For the Respondents: SMT.M.HEMALATHA, SRI.M.AJAY (IRUMPANAM), SHRI.M.DINESH, SRI.HARISH GOPINATH, SMT.KVP.JAYALEKSHMY, SHRI.R.S.KALKURA, SHRI.M.S.KALESH, SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN, SRI.V.VINAY MENON

Non-appearance of appellants justifies dismissal of appeal for default.

Headnote:The court examined the appeal filed under RSA No. 942 of 2010 related to lower court decrees dated 08.10.2009 & 24.09.2001. The appellants failed to appear at the hearings. The court found no justification to proceed in their absence and dismissed the appeal for default. The main issue was the appellants' non-appearance, leading to the decision to dismiss the case. As a result, the appeal was dismissed for default due to the absence of appellants.

J U D G M E N T

Yesterday when this matter was taken up for consideration, none appeared for the appellants. Accordingly, the matter was listed today. Today also none appeared for the appellants.

Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for default.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document