Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5487

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
LAKSHMIKUTTY AMMA, SREEKUMAR, SOUMYA, MAHASENAN PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 765 OF 2019

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: B.MOHANLAL
For the Respondents: V.A.AJIVAS

Withdrawal of criminal petitions allows for subsequent applications in trial courts.

Headnote:In this judgment, the High Court of Kerala addressed a Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 765 of 2019 concerning the withdrawal of a petition by the accused. The petitioners sought permission to withdraw their Crl.M.C., which was granted, allowing them to pursue a discharge petition in the lower Trial Court, culminating in the closure of Crl.M.C. as withdrawn.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the Crl.M.C., leaving open the option to file discharge petition before the Trial Court.

Permission granted.

Crl.M.C. is closed as withdrawn.

sd/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5487

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMG.GIRISH, JLAKSHMIKUTTY AMMA, SREEKUMAR, SOUMYA, MAHASENAN PILLAI – AppellantVersusSTATE – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 765 OF 2019

Withdrawal of criminal petitions allows for subsequent applications in trial courts.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
LAKSHMIKUTTY AMMA, SREEKUMAR, SOUMYA, MAHASENAN PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 765 OF 2019