Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5498

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ
C KUNHIKELU – Appellant
Versus
PREETHA M – Respondent
MAT.APPEAL NO. 19 OF 2015

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.Shrihari Rao, N.Shobha, A.S.Sreekanth
For the Respondents: K.Jayesh Mohankumar, Pushparajan Kodoth, T.Sethumadhavan (SR.), Vandana Menon

The appeal was dismissed as not pressed, indicating no determination on substantive legal issues.

Headnote:This judgment relates to a matrimonial appeal dismissed as not pressed, with no further judicial conclusions or substantive legal issues addressed. The court framed no distinct issues, relying on procedural grounds for the termination of the appeal without further analysis or deliberation. Consequently, the appeal was formally dismissed, concluding the case at this court.

Sathish Ninan, J.

Memo recorded.

Matrimonial Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Sathish Ninan, Judge P.Krishna Kumar, Judge rsr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5498

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMSathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJC KUNHIKELU – AppellantVersusPREETHA M – RespondentMAT.APPEAL NO. 19 OF 2015

The appeal was dismissed as not pressed, indicating no determination on substantive legal issues.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ
C KUNHIKELU – Appellant
Versus
PREETHA M – Respondent
MAT.APPEAL NO. 19 OF 2015