IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
V. DHARMARAJAN – Appellant
Versus
THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E), KERALA – Respondent
P.V. Balakrishnan, J.
This intra court appeal is filed by the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.4029 of 2015 challenging the judgment dated 27.08.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge, solely on the ground that interest for the amount of Rs.59,550/- which was ordered to be refunded to the writ petitioner, has not been granted.
2. The facts, which are necessary for the disposal of this appeal, are as follows;
The appellant filed the writ petition challenging Exts.P3, P4, P7, P10, P14 and P18 orders wherein the pay of the appellant was regularised/refixed, after noticing a mistake committed earlier during pay fixation and ordering recovery of the excess amount paid. The learned Single Judge, after considering the materials on record and hearing both sides, declined to grant the relief of quashment of Exts.P3, P4, P7, P10, P14 and P18 orders, after finding that there is no error in the action taken by the CJM for refixing the pay of the appellant and getting his pensionary benefits revised on the basis of the same. But, while ordering so, the learned Single Judge, after considering the decision of the Apex court in State of Punjab and Others v. Rafiq Masih (White Washer) [ (2015) 4 SCC 334 ], f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.