Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
RIYAS A. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's application to donate kidney rejected. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. urgency in resolving the donation appeal. (Para 3) |
| 3. court ordered a timely review of the application. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is the proposed donor of Mr.Abdurahiman who is undergoing treatment for kidney related issues. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:-
“a. call for the records leading upon Ext.P9 order and quash the same by issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and direct the 3rd respondent to grant approval for unrelated renal transplantation.
b. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P10 appeal, within a time stipulated by this Hon’ble Court.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted when the petitioner came to know about the disease of Mr.Abdurahiman, he expressed his readiness to donate his kidney. Thereafter, Ext.P4 joint application along with all necessary documents were submitted. However, the joint application of the petitioners was rejected by Ext.P9 stating that altruistic motive
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
