The court emphasized an expedited review process for organ donation appeals, highlighting the importance of fairness in administrative decisions.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the proposed donor of Mr.Abdurahiman who is undergoing treatment for kidney related issues. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:-

“a. call for the records leading upon Ext.P9 order and quash the same by issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and direct the 3^rd respondent to grant approval for unrelated renal transplantation.

b. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2^nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P10 appeal, within a time stipulated by this Hon’ble Court.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted when the petitioner came to know about the disease of Mr.Abdurahiman, he expressed his readiness to donate his kidney. Thereafter, Ext.P4 joint application along with all necessary documents were submitted. However, the joint application of the petitioners was rejected by Ext.P9 stating that altruistic motive of the petitioner is not found genuine as per the police report. Against Ext.P9, petitioner submitted Ext.P10 appeal before the second respondent.

Petitioners seek expeditious disposal of the same.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. Considering the urgency involved, the writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to take up Ext.P10, if the appeal is still pending and pass a reasoned order thereon within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall be afforded an opportunity of being heard..

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

SD/-