SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5518

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
REJI MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 331 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.1186/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.ASWINI SANKAR R.S., SRI.P.YADHU KUMAR, SMT.ASWATHY MENON, SMT.SIMMY JOSEPH
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C.ASHI

Pre-arrest bail granted considering lack of evidence connecting the accused to the alleged crime and absence of criminal record.

Headnote:This application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeks pre-arrest bail. The accused No.6 is alleged to have illegally hunted and butchered a Schedule I wild buffalo using an unlicensed firearm. The findings concluded that custodial interrogation for the applicant is unnecessary due to lack of criminal antecedents and an absence of material connection to the alleged crime. The court thus granted bail under specific conditions. The application is allowed.

Table of Content
1. application for pre-arrest bail under bnss. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's observations regarding innocence and conditions for bail. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.6 in Crime No.1186/2025 of Pulpally Police Station, Wayanad District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 3(1), 25(1B)(a) and 35 of the Arms Act .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on

07.11.2025 at Parakkadavu in Padichira amsom under the South Wayanad Division, Chethalath Range, accused Nos.1 to 6, trespassed into the Karnataka forest with the intention to commit an offence and using an unlicensed country-made firearm and ammunition, shot and killed a Schedule I wild buffalo, butchered it, transported the meat and sold it and thereby committed the offences.

4. I have heard Smt.Aswini Sankar R.S., the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the above crime. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of the applicant's intentional criminal acts, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6. As per the prosecution case, the gun used for the commission of the offence belonged to the accused No.1. It was seized also. The report of the investigating officer reveals that the allegation against the applicant is that he purchased and consumed the meat of the wild animal hunted by the other accused. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. Considering the allegations made against the applicant, his custodial interrogation seems unnecessary. For these reasons, I find this to be an appropriate case to grant pre-

arrest bail to the applicant.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The applicant shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JUDGE

APA

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top