Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5545

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
GOPAKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
M. R. AJITH KUMAR – Respondent
Cont Case (C) No.2772 of 2025 | W.P.(C) No.18653 of 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ARUN V.G., SMT.V.JAYA RAGI, SHRI.R.HARIKRISHNAN, SRI.NEERAJ NARAYAN, SMT.SREELAKSHMI J PILLAI, SMT.A.S.SALMA
For the Respondents: SRI.RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE

Compliance with earlier judgment confirmed, leading to closure of contempt case.

Headnote:In this case of contempt, the petitioner-Gopakumar contended that the judgment from W.P.

(C) No.18653 of 2025 dated 20.05.2025 had been complied with. The court found compliance to the aforementioned judgment, thereby concluding the contempt proceedings. The final decision is that the contempt case is closed.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the judgment dated 20.05.2025 in W.P.(C) No.18653 of 2025 has been complied with.

In view of the above, this contempt case is closed.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE RKM

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5545

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JGOPAKUMAR – AppellantVersusM. R. AJITH KUMAR – RespondentCont Case (C) No.2772 of 2025 | W.P.(C) No.18653 of 2025

Compliance with earlier judgment confirmed, leading to closure of contempt case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
GOPAKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
M. R. AJITH KUMAR – Respondent
Cont Case (C) No.2772 of 2025 | W.P.(C) No.18653 of 2025