IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
JAYAJEE G. – Appellant
Versus
STATE POLICE CHIEF – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 38004 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for police protection against life threats. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel arguments presented. (Para 3) |
| 3. assessment of threat validity and court's directive. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is the father of the 5th respondent and the father-in-
law of the 6th respondent. He seeks police protection against threat to his life by respondents 5 and 6, and has therefore approached this Court.
2. A counter affidavit has been filed by respondents 5 and 6 stating that the writ petition is filed at the behest of the 5th respondent's sister who had trespassed into her property and caused damages. It is also stated that the 5th respondent's sister does not have any right to enter into the property where the petitioner is residing and the attempt through this writ petition is to evict respondents 5 and 6 from their property. It is also stated that a suit has been filed as O.S.No.208 of 2025 restraining the 5th respondent's sister from trespassing into the plaint scheduled property therein which is the house belonging to the 5th respondent where the petitioner is also residing.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for respondents 5 and 6 apart from the learned Government Pleader.
4. Respondents 5 and 6 admitted that they have no intention to cause any sort of threat to the petitioner. It was also submitted that they have also no intention to evict the petitioner from the residence where he is now residing which belongs to the 5th respondent. In view of the above, the apprehension of threat to the petitioner does not subsist. However, if in case the petitioner apprehends any threat, necessarily, the 4th respondent shall interfere and ensure that law and order is maintained and the petitioner is not subjected to any harm. However, this order shall not enure any benefit to any person other than the petitioner and if in case any third party including the sister of the petitioner attempts to take benefit out of this order, the police shall not afford any protection to such persons.
With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.