JUDGMENT

Petitioner is the father of the 5^th respondent and the father-in-

law of the 6^th respondent. He seeks police protection against threat to his life by respondents 5 and 6, and has therefore approached this Court.

2. A counter affidavit has been filed by respondents 5 and 6 stating that the writ petition is filed at the behest of the 5^th respondent's sister who had trespassed into her property and caused damages. It is also stated that the 5^th respondent's sister does not have any right to enter into the property where the petitioner is residing and the attempt through this writ petition is to evict respondents 5 and 6 from their property. It is also stated that a suit has been filed as O.S.No.208 of 2025 restraining the 5^th respondent's sister from trespassing into the plaint scheduled property therein which is the house belonging to the 5^th respondent where the petitioner is also residing.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for respondents 5 and 6 apart from the learned Government Pleader.

4. Respondents 5 and 6 admitted that they have no intention to cause any sort of threat to the petitioner. It was also submitted that they have also