SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5570

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
...... – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 46019 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri.C.Dheeraj Rajan, Shri.Anand Kalyanakrishnan, Shri.Lobin Varghese
For the Respondents: Sri. K.S.Prenjith Kumar, SC for R2, Sri. Vivek Menon, SC for R3

The Court directed timely resolution of complaints regarding professional misconduct to uphold accountability in medical practice.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to a writ petition concerning allegations of sexual abuse against a medical professional. The petitioner sought timely action on her complaints. The Court directed the competent authority to resolve the complaints expeditiously, ensuring a hearing within three months. The court emphasized the need for a timely resolution of complaints under the relevant professional conduct regulations.

Table of Content
1. allegations of professional misconduct and the need for timely processing. (Para 1 , 2)
2. establishment of a women's sub-committee for addressing complaints. (Para 3)
3. court's directive for expeditious handling of complaints by competent authorities. (Para 4 , 5)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner alleges that she had filed a complaint before the 3rd respondent, raising allegations of sexual abuse by Dr. Vishnu A.S. as per Ext.P3. A similar complaint has been filed before the 2nd respondent as well. Petitioner through this writ petition seeks for direction to dispose of her complaints at the earliest.

2. The learned Standing Counsel for the 3rd respondent, upon instructions, submitted that the 2nd respondent has authorised the 3rd respondent to proceed with complaints received from Medical Professionals in the State of Kerala under the National Medical Commission, Registered Medical Practitioner (Professional Conduct) Regulations, 2023 and that the 3rd respondent is the Competent Authority to take appropriate action on complaints against Medical Professionals. It was also submitted that the complaint pending before the 3rd respondent as Ext.P3 is being processed.

3. The learned Standing Counsel for the 3rd respondent also submitted that by order dated 17-01-2026, it has been decided to constitute a Women's Sub-Committee to consider the complaint of the petitioner, and an online hearing has also been scheduled to be held on 04-02-2026.

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent, the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent, as well as the learned Government Pleader, I am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 application in a time-bound manner.

5. In view of the above, there will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 complaint, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within an outer period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as to the person against whom the complaint has been raised.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top