Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
... – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused petitions for quashing proceedings based on settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. affidavit filed affirming settlement between parties. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court observes consensual nature of relationship. (Para 6) |
| 4. proceedings quashed based on the findings. (Para 7) |
ORDER
Dated this the 29th day of January, 2026 The petitioner, who is the sole accused in Crime No.727 of 2021 of Viyyur Police Station, filed this Crl.M.C under Section 528 of the BNSS , 2023, praying for quashing all further proceedings against him. The offences alleged against the petitioner is under Sections 342 and 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The prosecution case is that, on 15.07.2019 and
04.09.2021, at Woodlands hotel, as well as in the rented house of the de facto complainant, the accused sexually abused the de facto complainant, after promising to marry her.
3. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, now the entire dispute between the parties has been settled and therefore, he prayed for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioner.
4. The de facto complainant/3rd respondent also affidavit stating that the entire dispute between them is settled and also th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
