IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
VINODH S. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 10097 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. understanding the nature of crimes involved and the amicable resolution. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. prosecutor's acknowledgment of the amicable settlement. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's rationale for quashing proceedings. (Para 6) |
ORDER
Dated this the 29th day of January, 2026 This is a petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. , by the accused in Crime No. 1333 of 2022 of Neyyattinkara police station, which is pending as C.C. No. 945 of 2022 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Neyyattinkara. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 451 , 341 and 323 of the IPC.
2. The prosecution case is that on 03.10.2022 at about 3.00 p.m., the accused trespassed into the residence of the defacto complainant, wrongfully restrained her, voluntarily caused hurt to her and thereby he is alleged to have committed the aforesaid offences.
3. According to the petitioner, the dispute has been amicably settled with the defacto complainant/victim/respondent No. 3 and that she agreed to drop all further proceedings relating to the above dispute. Therefore, the petitioner prayed for quashing all further proceedings against him.
4. The defacto complainant/victim filed affidavit endorsing the averments in the Criminal MC. According to her, the case has been amicably settled and that she does not intend to proceed with the case and also that further proceedings in the case can be quashed. She has no further grievance against the petitioner.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor, after getting instruction from the investigating officer also submitted that the dispute has been amicably settled between the parties and that the victim is not interested in continuing the prosecution against the petitioners.
6. Considering the fact that the offences involved in this case are not heinous and very serious, but purely of private in nature and now the dispute has been settled between the parties, quashment of the same is necessary for maintaining harmonious relationship between the parties and also to prevent abuse of process of the court.
In the result, this Crl. M.C is allowed. All further proceedings against the petitioner in C.C. No. 945 of 2022 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Neyyattinkara arising from Crime No. 1333 of 2022 of Neyyattinkara police station, is quashed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.