SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5588

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
MUHAMMED RASHID – Appellant
Versus
THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TOWN POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 10276 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.791/2022 | CC NO.1131 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.GOPIKA.N.NAIR
For the Respondents: SMT.SONA ROMILDA PODUTHAS

Settlement between parties can lead to quashing of criminal proceedings for non-heinous offences.

Headnote:This case involves a petition under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S for quashing proceedings against the accused in light of a settled dispute between the parties involved. The court finds that the alleged offences are not of a serious nature and allows the quashing. Key issues include the nature of the underlying dispute and the propriety of allowing a settlement to quash criminal proceedings. The court concludes that proceedings are quashed based on the settled dispute.

Table of Content
1. nature of dispute settled by petitioners (Para 1 , 2)
2. prosecutor's acknowledgment of settlement (Para 3)
3. court's decision based on nature of offences (Para 4)

ORDER

Dated this the 29th day of January, 2026 The petitioners who are the victims in Crime No. 791 of 2022 of Kozhikode Town Police Station, which is pending as C.C No. 1131 of 2022 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Kozhikode. They filed this petition under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S praying for quashing all further proceedings against the accused persons, namely respondents 2 to 7. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 143 , 147, 341, 323, 324, 506, 149 of the IPC .

2. The prosecution case is that on 01.12.2022 at about

11.15 p.m., the accused persons formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of their common object, they wrongfully restrained CWs1 to 4 and voluntarily caused hurt to CW1. According to the petitioners, now the entire dispute between the petitioners and the accused persons has been settled. Therefore, they prayed for quashing all further proceedings against respondents 2 and 7.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor upon instructions submitted that, the petitioners confirmed the factum of settlement to the SHO when he contacted them.

4. Considering the fact that the dispute between the petitioners and the accused persons has already been settled and the offences involved are not heinous or serious in nature, I am inclined to allow this Crl.M.C.

In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed. All further proceedings against the respondents 2 to 7 in Crime No. 791 of 2022 of Kozhikode Town Police Station, which is pending as C.C No. 1131 of 2022 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Kozhikode, is quashed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top