Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
SENTHIL KUMAR T – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner faces ipc offences with amicable settlement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defacto complainant endorses non-continuation of prosecution. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. quashment of proceedings to maintain harmony acknowledged. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
Dated this the 29th day of January, 2026 This is a petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. , by the accused in Crime No.714/2023 of Ernakulam Central police station, which is pending as CC. No.168/2025 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Ernakulam. The offences alleged against the petitioner is under Sections 354, 354A(1)(i), 323, 294(b), 447, 427 of IPC.
2. The prosecution case is that on 02.04.2024 at about 4.00 p.m., the accused trespassed into the courtyard of the quarters of the defacto complainant, voluntarily caused hurt to her, insulted her modesty, abused her using filthy words and caused damage to the defacto complainant and thereby he is alleged to have committed the aforesaid offences.
3. According to the petitioner, the dispute has been amicably settled with the defacto complainant/victim/ respondent No.3 and that 3 she agreed to drop all further proceedings relating to the above dispute. Therefore,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
