Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SULIFIKAR M.R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims interim custody due to vehicle seizure. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court hearings on interim custody request. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. precedent relied upon for decision-making. (Para 6) |
| 4. court's decision to grant custody with conditions. (Para 7) |
C.S.DIAS, J.
------------------------------------------ Crl.M.C. No. 9491 OF 2025 --------------------------------------------
Dated this the 29th day of January, 2026 ORDER The petitioner is the registered owner of a vehicle bearing No. KL-41F-0730, which has been seized by the Investigating Officer in Crime No.658/2025 registered by the Palarivattom Police Station alleging that the driver of the vehicle has committed the offences punishable under Section 271 read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 120 (e) of the Kerala Police Act, 2011 .
2. Claiming interim custody of the vehicle, the petitioner filed an application before the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-IX, Ernakulam (Trial Court) However, by Anneuxre II order, the Trial Court has dismissed the application on the ground that this Court in WP© No.7844/2023 has held that vehicle seized for committing the above offences shall
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
