Devan Ramachandran , J.

The allegation of the petitioners in this case is that the respondent – mother has not taken the child with her, though undertaken before this Court.

2. We cannot understand how the afore becomes a ground for initiating contempt action, particularly when the petitioners do not whisperingly say that any of the other directions in the judgment have not been complied with.

3. Obviously, the attempt of the petitioners is experimental.

This contempt case is, therefore, closed; however, clarifying that every other remedy available to the parties in law is not precluded.

Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN Sd/- M.B. SNEHALATHA stu APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) NO. 1055 OF 2025 PETITIONER ANNEXURES