Devan Ramachandran , J.

The petitioner seeks review of the judgment of this Court dated 12.08.2025, asserting that there is an error apparent on it because, this Court did not consider the impact of Section 12 (1)(c) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act').

2. The learned counsel for the review petitioner argued that his client had a specific case that his consent to marriage was obtained by fraud and misrepresentation; but that this had not been considered by this Court when the judgment was delivered.

3. We fail to understand the purport of the afore assertion because, the judgment sought to be reviewed, read in a whole, would clearly indicate the manner in which this Court dealt with every contention of the petitioner, including the one that is now impelled before us.

4. The attempt of the petitioner appears to be to have a rehearing of the appeal, which is impermissible under the ambit of review jurisdiction.

This petition is, therefore, dismissed.

Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN Sd/- M.B. SNEHALATHA stu