Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
SHALESH.C.S – Appellant
Versus
THE PALLIPPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition for enforcing stop memo on unauthorized constructions. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments on the existing legal status and final orders by officials. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court's observation on the enforcement of final orders. (Para 4) |
| 4. final conclusion directing compliance with court orders. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioners have filed the captioned writ petition, pointing out certain unauthorised constructions carried out by respondents 3 and 4, on account of which, a stop memo at Ext.P2 was issued by the Panchayat. It is seeking to implement the stop memo issued as above, that this writ petition has been presented.
2. Heard Sri. Shaju Purushothaman, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri. Athul Shaji, learned counsel for the 1st respondent and Sri.Biju P.N, learned counsel for respondents 3 and 4.
3. The learned counsel for respondents 3 and 4 would submit that during the pendency of this writ petition, the Panchayat had issued final orders pursuant to the stop memo at Ext.P2 also taking into consideration the objections filed by respondents 3 and 4. He would further state that the order issued as above has been challenged by the said respondents in accordance with
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
