Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5641

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
K.K.MOHAMED MUSTHAFA – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2914 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON, SRI.B.DEEPAK
For the Respondents: SMT.BINDUMOL JOSEPH, SHRI.PUSHKARAKSHAN V.P, SHRI.MANAS UNNIKRISHNAN

A writ petition becomes infructuous when circumstances negate the necessity for judicial determination.

Headnote:The petition pertains to WP

(C) No. 2914 of 2023 where the petitioner submits the petition is infructuous, which the court acknowledges. The court finds no basis for proceeding further, leading to the dismissal of the petition as infructuous. The court's finding succinctly frames the issue as whether the petition should proceed, concluding that the dismissal is warranted given the circumstances.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this wit petition has become infructuous.

Recording the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5641

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMHARISANKAR V. MENON, JK.K.MOHAMED MUSTHAFA – AppellantVersusREVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – RespondentWP(C) NO. 2914 OF 2023

A writ petition becomes infructuous when circumstances negate the necessity for judicial determination.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
K.K.MOHAMED MUSTHAFA – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2914 OF 2023