Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5657

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
ASRAFUL AGED 35 YEARS S/O ABDUL GAFFFAR – Appellant
Versus
THE KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 30558 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.AJIN K. KURIAKOSE
For the Respondents: SMT. G. SHEEBA, G.P.

Failure to comply with procedural orders results in dismissal of the writ petition.

Headnote:The writ petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's failure to serve the primary respondent and implead the local station house officer, which was mandated by the court. The court emphasized the lack of instructions from the petitioner as a basis for dismissal. The ruling highlights the importance of adherence to procedural requirements in legal petitions.

JUDGMENT

In spite of repeated directions of this Court, the Petitioner has not taken steps to complete service against Respondent No.1. The Petitioner was directed to implead his local SHO, and it was also not done. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that he has no instructions from the Petitioner.

Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5657

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMM.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, JASRAFUL AGED 35 YEARS S/O ABDUL GAFFFAR – AppellantVersusTHE KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD – RespondentWP(C) NO. 30558 OF 2025

Failure to comply with procedural orders results in dismissal of the writ petition.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
ASRAFUL AGED 35 YEARS S/O ABDUL GAFFFAR – Appellant
Versus
THE KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 30558 OF 2025