SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5657

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
ASRAFUL AGED 35 YEARS S/O ABDUL GAFFFAR – Appellant
Versus
THE KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.AJIN K. KURIAKOSE
For the Respondents: SMT. G. SHEEBA, G.P.

JUDGMENT

In spite of repeated directions of this Court, the Petitioner has not taken steps to complete service against Respondent No.1. The Petitioner was directed to implead his local SHO, and it was also not done. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that he has no instructions from the Petitioner.

Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top