IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
TONYMON TOMY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 29th day of January, 2026 The petitioner states that the 5th respondent appointed the petitioner as Office Attendant in St. Thomas College, Pazhavangadi, Ranni with effect from 07.02.2024. Thereafter, the 5th respondent sought a report on verification of the character and antecedents of the petitioner for the above post from the 4th respondent, as per Ext. P2.
2. The 4th respondent, by Ext.P3 communication, informed the 5th respondent that as a crime is pending against the petitioner, he is not suitable for appointment to the post until he is acquitted by a competent Court. By Ext.P4 order, the petitioner was acquitted from the criminal case mentioned in Ext.P3. Hence, the 5th respondent submitted Ext.P5 communication to 4th respondent seeking issuance of verification of character and antecedents report of the petitioner. Till now the 4th respondent has not issued the same. Unless it is issued at the earliest, the petitioner will put to prejudice and appointment of the petitioner could not be approved, contends the petitioner.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader representing respondents 1 to 4. Notice to t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.