IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
TONYMON TOMY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3078 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. verification of character required for appointment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. authorities must act on expeditious requests. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's directive for timely processing. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 29th day of January, 2026 The petitioner states that the 5th respondent appointed the petitioner as Office Attendant in St. Thomas College, Pazhavangadi, Ranni with effect from 07.02.2024. Thereafter, the 5th respondent sought a report on verification of the character and antecedents of the petitioner for the above post from the 4th respondent, as per Ext. P2.
2. The 4th respondent, by Ext.P3 communication, informed the 5th respondent that as a crime is pending against the petitioner, he is not suitable for appointment to the post until he is acquitted by a competent Court. By Ext.P4 order, the petitioner was acquitted from the criminal case mentioned in Ext.P3. Hence, the 5th respondent submitted Ext.P5 communication to 4th respondent seeking issuance of verification of character and antecedents report of the petitioner. Till now the 4th respondent has not issued the same. Unless it is issued at the earliest, the petitioner will put to prejudice and appointment of the petitioner could not be approved, contends the petitioner.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader representing respondents 1 to 4. Notice to the 5th respondent is dispensed with, in view of the nature of the relief to be granted in this writ petition.
4. The petitioner is aggrieved by the non-issuing of verification of character and antecedents report of the petitioner by the 4th respondent. The petitioner states that the criminal case against the petitioner has resulted in acquittal.
5. Ext.P5 is the communication submitted by the Manager of the College for verification of character and antecedents of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Office Attendant. The order attached to Ext.P5 would indicate that the petitioner has been acquitted of the criminal offence.
In the afore circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 4th respondent to take appropriate steps on Ext.P5 as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of 20 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Sd/-
N.NAGARESH JUDGE hmh APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 3078 OF 2026 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF APPOINTMENT OF THE PETITIONER DATED 07.02.2024 ISSUED BY THE FIFTH RESPONDENT Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION SUBMITTED BY THE FIFTH RESPONDENT TO THE FOURTH RESPONDENT DATED 16.02.2024 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT TO THE FIFTH RESPONDENT DATED 23.03.2024 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.