Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
TINTU CHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. approval of teachers' appointments from specified dates. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's directive for consideration of pending revision petitions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. conclusion directing timely action on the petitions. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 29th day of January, 2026 The 1st petitioner was appointed as UPSA on 01.06.2010 in an additional division vacancy available at the 5th respondent’s School. The 2nd petitioner was was promoted as HSA in an additional division vacancy. The grievance of the petitioners is that their appointments were approved only with effect from 01.06.2011. The prior period of service rendered by the petitioners were not approved by the Department so far.
2. The Government, based on G.O.(P)
No.199/2011/G.Edn. dated 01.10.2011, introduced the Teachers’ Package, whereby appointments of the Teachers made against additional division vacancies were directed to be approved with effect from 01.06.2011. Accordingly, the petitioners’ appointments were approved from 01.06.2011.
3. This Court has already declared the law that even though the Manager has not included the bond in terms of G.O(P) No.10/10/G.Edn. dated 12.01.2010, the Department can very well
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
