IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BABU MATHAI – Appellant
Versus
JOSHY VARGHESE – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed alleging violation of Annexure A1 judgment. The directions issued by this Court is extracted hereunder:
“4. On a consideration of the facts and materials on record, especially that Ext.P5 order was passed on 01.09.2022 and the same has not been implemented till date, I dispose of the writ petition by directing the fourth respondent to implement Ext. P5 order, in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is ordered accordingly.”
2. An affidavit is filed by the respondent. It would be better to extract paragraph Nos.3 and 4 :
“3. It is submitted that in the Exhibit P5 Order the Revenue Divisional Officer, Muvattupuzha directed the Tahsitdar (LR), Kunnathunad to conduct survey of the puramboke land coprised in Survey No. 78/8 in Block No. 38 of Puthencruz Village through Taluk Surveyor and initiate LC proceedings under the Kerala Land Concervancy act, 1957, if there is any encroachment. There was also a direction to Smt. Lissy Paulose, The 7th respondent to restore the thodu, which was restrained by the 7th respondent and thereby causi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.