SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5679

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SALINI TITTO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
RP NO. 114 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.42671 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.VISHNU NARAYANAN, SMT.NIYA VINCENT, SMT.ASWATHY KRISHNA M.P., SMT.ANUSREE K., SMT.THEJALAKSHMI R.S.
For the Respondents: SRI.K.JANARDHANA SHENOY, GP

Review petitions are valid to correct errors such as incorrect addresses of parties.

Headnote:The judgment addresses a review petition regarding WP

(C) No. 42671/2025, indicating that incorrect information concerning the 7th respondent's address justified a review. The Court determined it was appropriate to review the prior ruling. The judgment dated 14.11.2025 has been recalled, restoring the writ petition. The review petition is accordingly allowed.

ORDER

This review petition is filed to review the judgment dated

14.11.2025 in W.P.(C) No.42671/2025. The review petition is filed mainly for the reason that address of the 7th respondent is wrongly mentioned.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I think the judgment can be reviewed.

Therefore, this review petition is allowed. The judgment

14.11.2025 in W.P.(C) No.42671/2025 is recalled and the writ petition is restored.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top