SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5679

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SALINI TITTO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.VISHNU NARAYANAN, SMT.NIYA VINCENT, SMT.ASWATHY KRISHNA M.P., SMT.ANUSREE K., SMT.THEJALAKSHMI R.S.
For the Respondents: SRI.K.JANARDHANA SHENOY, GP

ORDER

This review petition is filed to review the judgment dated

14.11.2025 in W.P.(C) No.42671/2025. The review petition is filed mainly for the reason that address of the 7th respondent is wrongly mentioned.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I think the judgment can be reviewed.

Therefore, this review petition is allowed. The judgment

14.11.2025 in W.P.(C) No.42671/2025 is recalled and the writ petition is restored.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top