SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5687

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ANEESH.I – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR SWUCHITHWA MISSION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2983 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.C.S.MANILAL, SRI.S.NIDHEESH
For the Respondents: SR GP SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

The court mandates timely administrative review of the permit application, ensuring compliance within a specified timeframe.

Headnote:In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a mandamus directing the second respondent to expedite the consideration of the application for transporting meat waste as per Ext.P7. The court directed that the consideration must occur within 30 days of receiving the judgment, emphasizing compliance with the provided exhibits. The main issue was the timeliness of the response to Ext.P7 application. The court concluded that the second respondent should consider Ext.P7 expediently.

Table of Content
1. the petition seeks a review of an application. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court directs timely action on the application. (Para 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :

1. “Issue a writ of Mandamus or appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent to consider ExtP7 application for license /permission for the transportation of meat waste within a time limit to be fixed by this Honourable Court.

2. Issue a writ of Mandamus or appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent to permit the petitioner to transport the meat waste in accordance with ExtP7 application and also in tune with ExtP4 , P5 and P6 Government orders and guidelines .

3. Kindly dispense with the production of translation of vernacular documents. 4. Grant Such other Relief.” [sic]

2. The only prayer in this writ petition is to consider Ext.P7 by the 2nd respondent.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

4. After hearing both sides, I think that prayer can be allowed.

Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

1) The 2nd respondent is directed to consider Ext.P7, if the same is pending and it is in order, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 30 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2) The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition with exhibits before the 2nd respondent for compliance.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SKS

Judgment reserved NA
Date of Judgment 29/01/2026
Judgment dictated 29/01/2026
Draft judgment placed 31/01/2026
Final judgment uploaded 02/02/2026
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE VEHICLE DATED 07.12.2009 Exhibit P2 A COPY OF THE INSURANCE IN RESPECT OF THE VEHICLE ISSUED DATED 17/7/2025 Exhibit P3 A COPY OF THE RENEWED AGREEMENT DATED 6/1/

2026 Exhibit P4 A COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER G.O.(RT)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top