Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SAIJU AGED 47 YEARS – Appellant
Versus
SUB COLLECTOR TALUK OFFICE, TIRUR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. seeking judicial relief against an administrative order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the petitioner and governmental parties. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's evaluation of statutory compliance by the authority. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i. a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction to call for the records leading to Ext.P3 order and quash the same.
ii. a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction to first respondent to allow the application submitted by the petitioner under Form No. 5 of the Act, 2008 as evidenced by Ext.P2. OR a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction to the first respondent to reconsider application submitted by the petitioner under Form 5 of the Act, 2008 on the basis of the KSREC report and afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a reasonable time.
iii. Such other relief’s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the nature of this case.
iv. a direction to dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular document produced with this writ petition. ”[SIC]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order pas
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
