IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SIKANDARALI – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
“i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring that Exhibit P7 passed by the 1st respondent is illegal, arbitrary and unsustainable, to the extent it holds that the properties in Survey No. 67/9 are included in the Data Bank.
ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext P5 & P6 Form No.6 applications filed by the petitioners 1 & 2.
iii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring that the properties owned and possessed by the petitioners in Survey No. 67/9 of Ottapalam-II Village, Ottapalam Taluk is not included in the data bank.
iv. Issue a further direction commanding the 1st respondent to carry out necessary corrections in the revenue records, changing the classification of the petitioners’ lands from Nilam to Purayidom (dry land), pursuant to the orders to be passed on the petitioners’
Form No.6 applications.
v. Petitioner may be permitted to dispense with the filing of translation of the vernacular documents. And vi. Such other o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.