IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JINISHA M.K – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (RR) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3151 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks court intervention for timely decision. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court emphasizes the need for prompt action by authorities. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
“i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to 1st respondent /the authority concerned to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 application within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to 3rd respondent to submit report as called for from the 2nd respondent within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
iii. Dispense with the filing of the translation of vernacular documents.
iv. Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
[SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P3 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext. P3 application to the 1st respondent/Authorised O of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 1st respondent/Authorised O consider the Ext.P3 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 1st respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 1st and 3rd respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE GBG
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 3151 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT BEARING NO.
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of judgment
29.01.2026
Judgment dictated
29.01.2026
Draft Judgment Placed
30.01.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded
02.02.2026
KL07022322070/2025 DATED 22.10.2025 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE PUBLISHED DATA BANK OF KOCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BEARING NO.39217/2025 DATED
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.