IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ANOOP TOMY THALIYATH – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR ERNAKULAM – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
“i) Call for the records pertaining to Ext P2 application submitted by the petitioner.
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus, any other writ, appropriate order directing the 6th Respondent to complete the proceedings in connection with Exhibit P2 within a time frame.
iii) Issue a writ of mandamus, any other writ, appropriate order directing the 2nd or 3rd Respondent to complete the process in Exhibit P2 application (Form 5) on the basis of obtaining all necessary inputs within a time frame.
iv) This Honourable Court may be pleased to dispense with the translation of the vernacular documents produced in the vernacular language v) Provide cost of the proceedings”
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext. P2 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.