IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JACOB PHILIP@LALY PHILIP – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR PATHANAMTHITTA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“1. Issue writ of mandamus or appropriate writ or direction to the
1st respondent quashing Exhibit-P7 proceedings.
2. Issue writ of mandamus or appropriate writ or direction to the respondents not to make any alteration to the lie and nature of the property in question or to make any obstruction to the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment over the property covered by Exhibit-P1 and Exhibit-P2.
3. Dispense with the filing of English translation of Vernacular documents.
4. Grant such other and further relief that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to deem fit and proper in this case.” (SIC)
2. The impugned order in this case is Ext.P7.
Admittedly, Ext.P7 is a proceedings issued by the District Collector, Pathanamthitta invoking the powers under Section 13 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act , 2008. Admittedly, a revision is maintainable against the same. In such circumstances, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition.
3. At this stage, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is ready to file a revision and there may be a direction to consider the same and till t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.