IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MANOJKUMAR MURALIDHARAN PILLA – Appellant
Versus
THRIKKOVILVATTOM GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to take emergent action on Exhibit P3 and remove the flag post and statue erected on the road margin, in front of the property of the petitioner in accordance with law within a timeframe manner;
ii) Dispense with filing of English Translation of the vernacular documents.
iii) Award the cost of the petitioner;
iv) Issue such other reliefs that this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved because a statue and a flag is erected in front of the petitioner's property affecting the ingress and egress to the property. The petitioner submitted Ext.P3 representation before the 2nd respondent. The same is not considered is the grievance of the petitioner. The petitioner also relied on Ext.P2 judgment. Hence this Writ Petition is filed.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.
4. After hearing both sides, I am of the considered opinion that this Writ Petition need not be r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.