IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JULIET PRAKASIA – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF KOCHI – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“(i) Issue a writ of certiorari and call for records leading to issuance of Exhibit P9 order and quash the same.
(ii) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order, directing the respondents to abstain from any act of blocking the vehicular road access of the petitioners.
(iii) Pass such other writ order or direction as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper (iv) Award the costs of the Writ Petition (v) To dispense with the filing of English translation of vernacular documents produced as Exhibits.” (SIC)
2. The main prayer in this writ petition is against Ext.P9. Now admittedly a suit is pending before the Civil Court for the same cause of action. If that be the case, this Writ Petition need not be retained here. All the contentions raised by the petitioners including the contention against Ext.P9 are left open and the petitioners and the party respondents are free to agitate the same before the jurisdictional Civil Court, in accordance with law. I make it clear that Ext.P9 will be subject to the final orders to be passed by the Civil Court.
With the above observation, this Writ Petition is dis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.