IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
HARILAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i. issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 2nd respondent to implement Exhibit P4 and exclude the property of the petitioner from the databank by notifying the same.
ii. issue such other order or direction, as this Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper to grant."
[SIC]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of the 2nd respondent in carrying out the removal of the petitioner’s land from the data bank and notifying the same even after the 2nd respondent finds that the property of the petitioner is liable to be removed from the data bank. Hence this Writ Petition is filed. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. There is no dispute to the fact that Ext.P4 became final.
If that be the case, the 2nd respondent has to implement the same in accordance with the law.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
The 2nd respondent is directed to implement Exts.P4 and P5, and do the needful in accordance with the law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.