IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MADHU ABRAHAM – Appellant
Versus
PUTHUPPALLY GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" 1. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction calling for the records leading to exhibit P15 and quash the same as illegal.
2. Declare that the 2nd respondent have no jurisdiction or authority to nullify a decree of a competent civil court as evidenced by Ext.P6 and P7 by resorting to Ext.P15. 3. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the respondent No 2 to reconsider the whole matter after giving an opportunity to the petitioners and after physically inspecting the site in question and take appropriate decision in accordance to law with particular reference to Exhibits.P5, P6 and P7."
[SIC]
2. Petitioners earlier approached this Court by filing W.P(C) No.2455/2025 as evident by Ext.P13. This Court disposed of the writ petition with the following directions:
" The petitioners are aggrieved by the Ext.P11 and P12 notices issued by the 2nd respondent, alleging that the petitioner had carried out certain unauthorized constructions encroaching upon the property vested with the Panchayat. The specific contention raised by the petitioners in this writ petition is t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.