Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5724

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
FATHIMA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COLLECTOR (RR) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 37047 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.NIDHI BALACHANDRAN
For the Respondents: SMT.PREETHA K K, GP

Dismissal of writ petition occurs due to lack of representation by the petitioner.

Headnote:This writ petition was listed for consideration, but the petitioner failed to appear. The court acknowledged the absence and listed the case for a future date. Ultimately, due to the lack of representation, the court dismissed the petition for default. The judgment concludes with the order for dismissal for default.

JUDGMENT

When this writ petition came up for consideration on 06.01.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner and therefore the case was listed to 11.02.2026. Then an interlocutory application is filed for early posting and accordingly this writ petition again listed today. Today also there is no representation for the petitioner.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5724

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JFATHIMA – AppellantVersusDEPUTY COLLECTOR (RR) – RespondentWP(C) NO. 37047 OF 2025

Dismissal of writ petition occurs due to lack of representation by the petitioner.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
FATHIMA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COLLECTOR (RR) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 37047 OF 2025