SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5724

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
FATHIMA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COLLECTOR (RR) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 37047 OF 2025



Important Points

Dismissal of writ petition occurs due to lack of representation by the petitioner.

Subject

Civil - Writ Petition

Headnote

This writ petition was listed for consideration, but the petitioner failed to appear. The court acknowledged the absence and listed the case for a future date. Ultimately, due to the lack of representation, the court dismissed the petition for default. The judgment concludes with the order for dismissal for default.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.NIDHI BALACHANDRAN
For the Respondents: SMT.PREETHA K K, GP

JUDGMENT

When this writ petition came up for consideration on 06.01.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner and therefore the case was listed to 11.02.2026. Then an interlocutory application is filed for early posting and accordingly this writ petition again listed today. Today also there is no representation for the petitioner.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default.

Sd/-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top