Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
DANIEL THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for action on advertisements (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel's submission on timely consideration (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs necessary action on representations (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“i. Issue a writ or directions in the nature of, or similar to, a writ of mandamus, or any order or direction directing the respondent no. 8 to take immediate steps to remove the surveillance cameras and advertisement boards and the advertisement board of the shop named “AGD Gold (Arabian Gold) & Diamonds” on the poles of traffic signal lights at Charummoodu, Mavelikkara Road on the basis of Exhibit-P14 notice issued by the 2nd respondent.
ii. Issue a writ or directions in the nature of, or similar to, a writ of mandamus, or any order or direction directing the respondent no. 4 & 8 to take the necessary steps to consider the representation Exhibit-P15 & P16 submitted by the petitioner and to take action against the illegal act of removing the signal lights from the Thatarampalam junction within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
iii. To dispense with the translation of documents in vernacular language.
iv. Pass such
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
