IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. SOUMEN SEN, CJ, MR. SYAM KUMAR V.M., J
JOY JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Heard Ms. Daisy A. Philipose, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Philip J. Vettickattu, learned counsel for the 7th respondent, and Mr. V. Tekchand, learned Senior Government Pleader.
2. In view of the fact that proceedings have already been initiated by the authorities concerned for realisation of penalties under Section 21 (5) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act , 1957 read with Rule 108 of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules , 2015, we are not inclined to pass any further orders, save and except that the State shall complete the proceedings as expeditiously as possible, and in the event it is found that there is contravention of any other provisions, take immediate steps for realisation of the penalties, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from date. The final decision shall be communicated to the writ petitioner.
3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.