Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
SHAJI MECHERI VARGHESE – Appellant
Versus
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, INDIAN BANK – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3122 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to sale notice by petitioner. (Para 1) |
| 2. petition dismissed due to non-materialization of sale. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
(Dated this the 28th day of January, 2026)
The writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P3 sale notice for recover for an amount of Rs.1,71,03,422/-, which was scheduled today. The time stipulated for the auction was from 10.00 a.m. to 4.00 p.m.
2. The learned counsel for the respondent Bank submits that since there were no bidders, the sale did not materialise.
Therefore, the writ petitin has practically become infructuous and the same is dismissed.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
