Interim orders and compliance issues under the SARFAESI Act.

Headnote:The judgment addresses the challenge against notices under Sections 13(2) and 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act. The petitioners, represented by counsel, face compliance issues regarding an interim order for remittance. The Court ultimately closes the writ petition with liberty to reopen, pending compliance with previous directives.

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 28^th day of January, 2026)

Exts.P1 and P2, which are notices under Sections 13(2) and 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act , are under challenge in this writ petition. An interim order was passed by this Court on 28.02.2017 directing that dispossession shall be stayed on condition that the petitioner remits an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- within one month. It is not discernible whether the petitioner has complied with the said order. There is also no representation for the petitioner today.

In such circumstances, I close this writ petition with liberty to reopen if the cause survives.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5751

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBASANT BALAJI, JSURESH KUMAR – AppellantVersusTHE AUTHORIZED OFFICER THE URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD – RespondentWP(C) NO. 6542 OF 2017

Interim orders and compliance issues under the SARFAESI Act.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
SURESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER THE URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6542 OF 2017