Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
MUJEEB REHMAN A. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court considers the implications of sexual consent and allegations of financial fraud. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments made regarding the evidence of consent and financial transactions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court evaluates the sufficiency of evidence to sustain charges. (Para 7 , 11) |
| 4. final determination on charges based on absence of evidence for certain offences. (Para 8 , 10 , 12) |
O R D E R
(Dated this the 28th day of January, 2026)
The petitioner is the 1st accused in S.C No.1653 of 2021 on the file of the Fast Track Special Court (PoCSO), Karunagappally, arising out of Crime No.720 of 2020 of Ochira Police Station. He filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.PC praying for quashing all further proceedings against him. The offences alleged against the petitioner and the other accused person are under Sections 376 , 420, 409, 509 and 506 r/w Section
34 of IPC .
2. The prosecution case is that the 1st accused with an intention to satisfy his sexual lust, sexually abused the de facto complainant, who approached him for legal advice, repeatedly since February 2019 at different places, after promising to marry her. It is also alleged that he obtained her nude photographs,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
